Quarks and Kytons: 2014

Friday, October 10, 2014

Where Einstein left off..

© Kyle Vincent Schiefer and "Quarks and Kytons" blog, 2014. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material, to include derivation of, and not limited to, experimentation and/or utilization of theses contained herein, prototyping of proposed technologies and/or implementation of any or all parts of proposed commercial plans without express and written permission from this blog’s author and owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Kyle Vincent Schiefer and "Quarks and Kytons" blog with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

New York, NY - Bus Terminal Queue - October 10-11 2014 ACE/AD

Anyone who has ever cultivated even the slightest interest in science typically knows the most famous equation in the field; E=mc^2. This was the simplistic equation that came from the brilliant mind of Albert Einstein regarding his theory of gravitational and general relativity as an defined by the motion of light as it reaches terminal velocity. A simple equation that clearly carries far more value and complexity than the six (or five depending on how its written) characters that comprise it. But if something as complex as the physical mechanics of light, as affected by gravity, can be boiled down to a handful of characters.. why can't the rest of the universe?

This very question is what started me along this strange and wonderful path of discovery and dates as far back as my elementary school days. Why is light the only force we have been able to "crack" withing the last 100+ years, and why in the name of science did Einstein only seem to focus on light and gravity with null regard for the other fundamental dynamic forces of heat and magnetism? In all reality we may NEVER know why he didn't focus on those underpinnings of physics. However, in spite of this realization, undeterred, I have taken it upon myself to, instead, build upon the foundations of my scientific forefathers. And I always do so by first questioning why?

Why is it that a visually observed plume of flames can to be felt across a greater distance than it otherwise should based on its visually smaller size? And for that matter, if lightning is supposed to be raw electricity built up by atmospheric friction, why is it that it frequently carries the direct current that has the ability to spark violent wildfires? And best of all, how is it that a current that encounters resistance creates infared heat radiation, while the same design of apparatus, albeit with a less resistant coil, will instead produce electromagnetic radiation that can be harnessed for other means of producing energy-based work? All questions that I intend to cover theoretically as I delve into the scientific underpinnings of the universe. Get comfy my esteemed curios of science. I am about to pick up the mantle as I attempt to further develop our collective understandings of science, and pick up,where Einstein left off.

My first point, I will attempt to illustrate based on my firsthand experience observing the pyrotechnics of various stage shows (from a reasonable distance) and the thoughts that aroused thereof. My first encounter with this radiant effect occurred when I was a younger man. I happened to have the fortunate opportunity to see a stage show of Batman at the Six Flags: Magic Mountain theme park in Southern California. And at one point in the show there were large explosive plumes of fire used to emphasize the mayhem and destruction being caused by the our hero's particular villains. However, as these bursts of flame were launched from the stage, I observed a very interesting effect as the burst of flame that I was clearly observing from an excess of 50 feet, could be felt, if only for a moment, on the skin of my arms and face. This immediately struck me as odd given that my previous life experiences taught me that heat rises and generally will ascend from its point of origin much faster than it will move horizontally. I of course am referring to various encounters with campfires, bonfires, and all other manner of controlled flame that one might safely encounter as a child.

But this was different on a very tangible level and ultimately brought to mind images of the initial blast of outward energy from the likes of an atomic explosion. Needless to say I felt very confused, and the conflicting ideas and experiences in my own head were summarily dismissed shortly thereafter as I chose to carry on watching the show. But then the plumes launched again, and finally for a third time much larger than the first two combined. At this point I had three separate, but similar observations which with to formulate more clear conclusions. Ultimately I came to the realization that many of us probably take for granted frequently in our day to day lives; heat, although the basic form of energy created by fire, is not ultimately synonymous with the physical manifestation of fire itself. In fact they are quite different from each other even though they are indisputably linked.

Although I saw the physical boundaries of the fire as it rose from its launch point, I simultaneously felt the heat from it, at a distance, because of the molecular displacement of the air as it was suddenly forced outward by the explosion of fire. This displacement transformed into molecular friction that ultimately caused a radiant wave of heat that was able to travel much further than the actual fire itself, constrained as it was by the surrounding preponderance of "cooler" atmospherics energy.

So how is this news? For starters, this allows for the fundamental, fourth-dimensional thinking neccesary to humor the concept, that radiant energy can be separate and distinct from the visual observations of energy dispersal. Which brings me to my next point. Why is it that lightning is typically understood as the discharge of static electricity that has collected within the stratosphere? If that be the case, then shouldn't we be thinking of the convection currents in our atmosphere as nothing more than giant versions of wool blankets in a clothes dryer? Blankets that inexplicably accrue a charge as they tumble around and over each other? Perhaps, but I do not simply regard the knowledge of observation as evidence enough to account for unexplained buildups of electricity in my laundry nor the atmosphere at large. After all how can dust and water vapor in the air cause a build up of electricity?

Instead, I try to think about the what these two occurrences have in common? They both deal with the transformation of water vapor to of from liquid form. And they both consist of convection-based motion as the materials in question repeatedly tumble over and aroj d each other causing friction. Coupled with the outside heat source of the dryer's heating element, and the energy of the sun, these interactions begin to combine and interact in a way that is similar to that of an electromagnetic generator, albeit a fairly inefficient one. And as applied to both the atmospheric accrual and discharge of lightning and the static electricity on your freshly dried socks, it is clear that the electromagnetic force is much more prevalent than even our modern understanding would care to admit.

But even if this idea may seem radical, it still begs the question, why is it that, what is obviously a natural manifestation of the electromagnetic force, lightning, can trigger such wanton destruction in the form of forest fires. Given our current understanding of electricity and the inherent thermodynamics of resistance thereof, it can be assumed that lightning, with it's immense voltage, actually carries the same basic energy responsible for the manifestation of fire, and subsequently, heat, when conducted through biomatter (i.e. trees, people, etc.).
This is a monumental link in understanding because of the fact that it bridges the gap between electricity, heat, light, and in some regard, magnetism.
While you may be scratching your head or even objecting outright based on your own education in the subjects of science, I ask that you bear with me. There is an underlying method to this madness.

So lightning is inherently linked to light heat and possibly magnetism? Why is this important, because my fellow scientists, this understanding can be developed and applied into the largely sought after theory of unified fields. We already have a fundamental understanding of how we can apply these dynamic effects to traditional systems of heat and electricity generation via the conduction of current through a circuit with various degrees of ohm resistance. But what if we were to combine all of these forces into one dynamo that could simultaneously produce heat, magnetism, and electricity in cyclical amounts so as to become self sustaining. To answer that question I must conduct some experiments related to gleaning specific principles of how these forces interact. However, based on the various hypothetical outcomes of such experiments, I already have various designs in mind and would gladly share them with my peers should they be so inclined to inquire further. However an undertaking such as this must not be taken lightly as a truly self-sustaining force can quickly surpass control measures should all the variables not be properly accounted for and mitigated beforehand.

But at this point, innovation is still a work in progress and will always be easier if you understand the fundamental reasoning behind it first. So I will get back on course. The reality of these questions is that they are based on observations that are not completely understood, or otherwise dismissed as inexplicable. Nonsense. As Einstein put it so succinctly, it is all relative. But why? What is the underlying reasoning, mechanic, or even purpose of the physics of the universe? Because even the cosmos play by a set of rules. And based the observational dichotomy of my own observations of various forms of visible, and tangible manifestations of energy, in the forms of lightning, fire, and electromagnetism, (along with the relative effects of energy transfer of each), it is clear to me that there is another side to this entire physics thing that we have only begun to understand.

So I pose the questions to you, my readers, how to we break the scientific stagnation that we have been trapped in for the last century. Understandably, we have made huge technological advancements in that time, but they have been advancements based on the musings and theoretical observations that ultimately gave us the equation, E=mc^2. And if we are indeed the smartest species on this planet, why is it that we have become a society that delegates the "menial" task of thinking to our smartphones? How do we escape the doldrums and make real progress in the realms of science again, in lieu of the than simple conduction of trial and error experimentation that got us this far? Easy.. we have to aim to understand the bigger picture, and we have to pick up, where Einstein left off?

Thursday, September 25, 2014

The fundamental dynamics of Kytonic Theory

New York, NY - Domicile, Rooftop - 25 September 2014 ACE/AD

Introduction:
Imagine a colorblind dog who can only see in grayscale, or even an intelligible human who was born with the same type of canine-like, grayscale-colorblindness. Now imagine that the person had undergone an operation and received the optic cones needed to see color for the very first time. But, before they had a chance to open their eyes and see, they were blindfolded and moved to a room with red walls. Then the person is instructed to, “remove the blindfold, open [their] eyes, and “observe the color ‘blue’ for the first time.” As the person sees this color ‘blue’ for the first time, the visual association that is formed will be so strong that, unless corrected, the individual would continue to develop a very confused definition of color from that moment forward.

Kytonics provide us with the ability to make that correction in the realms of universal science, but most importantly, universal physics. We can see what we missed, where we went wrong, and most importantly, how to get back on track to becoming the great evolutionary species we have always dreamt of. Kytonic Theory is a conceptual idea goes deeper beyond even our patchwork ideas of quantum mechanics and sub-atomic interactions; it explains the underlying mechanics of the universe. This idea differs from the currently accepted Superstring and M-Theories in that the nature of Kytonic Particles remains constant no matter the size, location, movement, complexity, or other differentiating characteristic.

In addition to remaining constant, this theory can explain any observable mysteries of the universe by allowing for a thought experiment that systematically reduces the action to the least common denominator like a mathematical fraction. This same reduction can then be reversed, and recompiled in order to glean knowledge about the fundamental dynamics of the energy interactions responsible for the physics of our universe as perceived forward through time. Ultimately this theoretical understanding makes the secrets pour out faster than they can be documented, and do so in logical form based in actual observational knowledge.

Fundamental Dynamics:
The universe, down to its lowest point and smallest pieces, is comprised of monopolaric clusters of pure energy. These 1st level ‘Kytons’ impact each other at varying degrees, causing them to become fused together and combine into either spin or vector ‘existence pairs’ that have corresponding motional states. These existence pairs also now exert ‘net charge forces’ of opposing, positive and negative, magnetic-like effects outward at a distance relative to its ‘net charge quotient.’ As a result, these pairs strive to move towards their nearest, similarly-charged, opposing partner in an attempt to regain the delicate balance that was lost during the first impact.

Some Kytons are so erratic that they are pushed past terminal neutral, and transition between 1st and 2nd –level Kytonic existence very rapidly. All the while, these shifting energy clusters radiate and absorb the excess energies from kytonic transition to and from its surrounding kytons. This happens over and over causing extreme transitional chaos that continues until they begin to slow their rate of transition enough to begin to have persistent charge cores. This only happens when one pair succeeds in impacting a second pair in such a way that it causes the new net charge to be at least 2/3 dominated by one polarity or the other.

At which point the existence pair ascends the Kytonic ladder to become a persistent pair. And it is named as such because its 2/3 charge dominance allows it to retain its existence for a minimum of 2 subsequent impacts. This is because the driving 2/3 of force will attempt to impact with a second group that has an opposing driving force that is 1/3 the strength of the opposing charge needed to gain balance. During this impact, the net change will result one of two things:

-The two will make a perfect balanced group and elevate to the 4th Kytonic level and become a Progenitor Particle that can subsequently reproduce itself by meiosis, and considered the first life form,
OR

-The impact will result in the dominant-driving group becoming more balanced and accelerated along the corresponding driving charge (accelerant group).

In either case, there will almost always be a simultaneous shedding of excess ‘passenger charge’ energy, along with at least one unit of drive charge energy in the form of a more unbalanced persistence group (decelerate group), like so:

(Graphic to be added later)

At which point, both particles begin to search out their next target with corresponding opposing drive charges. However, these new, post-impact persistence groups both act differently from each other now that one is accelerated and the other is decelerated. The accelerated group still carries a passenger charge that has at least ½ the energy quotient of the driving charge, and can still survive a minimum of 2 subsequent impacts. Alternately, the decelerated group has a passenger charge that has less than ½ of its related drive charge energy quotient and has a “do-or-die” 50% chance of impacting another persistence group that will not kill it (forcing it to transition, and suffer charge-reversal once again).

As this cycle continues, the persistence groups begin to create an increasing number of 4th level, Progenitor clusters. These clusters begin to become increasingly net-charged until it can reproductively copy its own persistence pair without losing the energy required to maintain its own core charge. This can be done through mitosis, meiosis, etc., but these 3rd level copies are fragile. Although they are delicate, they drive the most vigorously towards their charge partner group due to their relative balance and still stand a better chance of NOT getting ‘killed off’ before then. At which point, each copied charge structure immediately begins to drive its nearest charge partner in an ever-persistent need regain pure, 1st level, kytonic balance.

As this cycle continues to cascade into itself striving for balance, the process produces more and more balanced progenitor clusters at the 4th kytonic level. The groups begin to take on all manner of shapes and sizes of varying balance and impact complexity. And eventually, the 5th level perception group is formed in the act of 3rd level persistence group becoming perfectly balanced, yet trapped between an unbalanced, yet stable formation of shell particles. Sort of like a cell nucleus developing a separate, but symbiotic cell wall that yields stability to both. The nucleus then functions as a perception center (mind) and the cell wall becomes the protective shell (the body). It is at this point, that the kytonic clusters can be classified as ‘aware’ of their surroundings, and you can observe the most rudimentary life form in existence; atoms.

At this point, the atoms of either positive or negative charge take on a distinct form that can be observed relatively. As I stated earlier, the positive motional state produces a spin-effect, while the negative motional state produces a vector-effect. This is apparent on the atomic scale where relative-pos. atoms will always appear stationary with an erratically spinning cell wall, and relative-neg. atoms will appear to have stable cell walls (that obscure the internal energy) and move very fast. If these sound like regular old atomic particles and waves, then I have not lost you in the course of my explanation. In fact, you seem to be following right along.

Although waves are commonly thought to be in a completely different spectrum than atoms, I assure you, they are two sides to the same energy interaction. In fact, waves are not waves as we know them. Rather, they are the very same negative atoms I described that simply move in a spiraling motion due to their intrinsic motional state. This means that the microwaves that heat your food are nothing more than tiny negative atoms that are being bombarded onto your food, causing friction atomic friction and discharge of energy throughout your food. This is also why your food always seems to be warmer towards the top-center; because negative atoms pass through other negative atoms via the negative-dominant, atomic conduit created by the water in your food, and strive to combine with the most positive dense atoms nearby (i.e. the gravitational center of your meatloaf) creating atomic frictional heat that subsequently rises.

As these atoms continue to strive to attain balance, we see a continuation of the recombinant cascade of energy and an increase in motional complexity (as permitted by the relativistic charges of their surroundings). As such, we can observe the interactions of a vast kytonic array of life, elemental materials, and various radiant forces. In time, we will eventually achieve perfect balance between our positive and negative, mind and body cores yet again, and ascend to the next highest, 6th Kytonic level. In the meantime, I want to get the word out, and so I have.

As always, question everything, dismiss nothing, and stay rational! Until next time, thanks for reading!

Wednesday, September 24, 2014

Kytonic Theory as evidenced by zero gravity accretion

New York, NY - College Campus - 24 September 2014 ACE/AD

There is a very important interaction that takes place between objects when the effects of earth gravity are reduced to non-perceptible levels in space; accretion. Originally, the word was used to describe the formation of tectonic plates and other geothermal densities within the Earth's crust. However, the word developed a far more detailed meaning after an accidental (yet no less monumental) discovery aboard the ISS by Dr. Don Pettit during one of his "Saturday morning science" exhibitions. Follow the link to the official NASA experiment info page for more details @ http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/215.html

What he observed was that tiny salt particles, when suspended in water, began to naturally form into larger and larger clumps of salt when they collided with each other in their plastic bag "containment zone." And while this was ultimately attributed to simple "electrostatic" machinations, I must concede that while I disagree, I feel that they are on the right track. Needless to say, the proposed intent to repeat the experiment at a future date, with different materials and more control variables has me on eagerly awaiting the eventual results.

That said, I DO in fact disagree that what was observed can simply be dismissed as simple electostaticity in action. In fact, I believe what was occurring, was the constant relativistic gravitational attraction between multiple, positive charge, mass bearing objects. This is observed as the more dense, but less numerous objects (salt particles) are compelled to condense by a preponderance of similarly positive charge particles (water molecules), exhibiting a more neutralizing, yet overbearing positive energy charge similar to the way clouds are formed as I discussed in my previous post, "Concerning the impact relationships of fundamental particles relative to their intrinsic and surrounding charges as observed in atmospheric disturbances."

Given that the gravitational entanglement relationship between the water and salt are diminished below the point of affectation in the zero gravity environment, we see the effects of internal Kytonic attraction and repulsion in stark detail. However, though the salt particles indeed begin clumping together due to relativistic effects, they seem to do so with distinct irregularity, hence the dismissal of electrostatic interference. However, this can be attributed to just one simple fact; the attraction and repulsion effects of the Kytonic energies are constant and limitless in range.

As such, Earth's gravitational effects on the salt, though weak and largely imperceptible, are still present and effective. This means that although the "zero-gravity" environment appears to negate the effects of Earth gravitation, it is merely being mitigated to such a degree that the salt particles' innate attractive force is more powerful. Ultimately resulting in erratic formation of clumps due to the close range attraction between the salt, and the long range gravity of Earth.

It is important to note at this point, that as the salt accretes into larger and larger clumps, they will begin to reflect the effects of an increased gravitational effect in relation to its mass and distance from Earth and will also exhibit a proportional decline in rate of growth as the nearby particles are "consumed" into the greater formation. This accounts for the irregular shapes formed by the salt particles as they come together. Interestingly enough, if we were to continue to add mass to the clumps being formed, the formations would eventually begin to pull themselves into spherical shapes as their masses began to equalize with other nearby massive objects in a manner proportional to their distances from each other.

At this point, I must clarify that some of the limitless and constant kytonic ranges I mentioned can SEEM to dissipate or become otherwise limited due to relativistic mechanics in two distinct ways. The first is relativistic "cropping," in which a dense, overpowering force can function like a solid barrier relative to the lesser force. The second is relativistic "blending," where the force stretches or reverberates to such a great distance and degree that it becomes so minuscule that it seems to disappear within its surroundings. Both forms are simply just the same effect manifested in different ways due to a core charge's motional state relative to that of its surroundings.

Thus far, I have mentioned gravitational effects numerous times. However, I would like to take this opportunity to stress that given my developed understanding of kytonic theory, gravity is not a fundamental force at all, but merely a principle manifestation of relativistic effects of kytonic forces interacting at varying degrees and distances. In fact, my Kytonic Theory actually proposes that gravity itself is actually nothing more than a diluted form of the Strong Nuclear force (kytonic attractive), interacting with a preponderance of the the weak nuclear force (kytonic repulsive) in varying degrees. Except the monochres of strong and weak are also misleading as they are both relative and equal sides of the same coin.

The strong and weak nuclear forces, as we know them, are so named because the strong force seems to overpower the weak in fusion reactions such as we can observe in our home star, Sol. However these names are misleading because the strong force, although powerful, is actually the weaker of the two forces in the relativistic fusion reaction of our star. And, in the same way that clouds are formed in our atmosphere by condensation, so too is the high energy of the sun being compressed by a preponderance of relatively weaker, but more voluminous energy from the surrounding pressure of space.

This EXACT same effect is observed in the bag of water and salt. While the water is arguably less dense than the salt, the overbearing volume of the liquid forces the particles to condense and clump together amongst themselves. This interaction is key to understanding the fundamental nature of the universe through Kytonic Theory.

As I said earlier, I eagerly await the results of NASA's future experiments in "zero-gravity" accretion. And I hypothesize that any "dense" material, suspended within an overbearing volume of less dense material will begin to accrete into larger clumps similar to the Saturday morning science experiment by Dr. Don Pettit.

In fact, I predict more specifically, that if multiple densities of material particles (i.e. metal dust, dried tea leaves, and salt) were all suspended together, the more dense material will become the clump cores, while the other less dense materials will appear to collect around those cores similar to the formation of rust through oxidation of iron.

The applications and understanding that can be gleaned from Kytonic Theory are as vast as it is fundamental. After all, I have stumbled onto the underlying, least common denominator of the universe and with it, the cosmos has become my playground. I have only begun to scratch the surface of the universe and greater secrets still await. So stay tuned for applications in fusion generators, hyperspace travel, cryogenic preservation, the utilization of black hole "batteries," and even time travel! (To name a few)

Thanks for reading and I hope to see you back soon. In the meantime, question everything, dismiss nothing, and as always, stay rational.

Monday, September 22, 2014

The Strawberry and the Watermelon

© Kyle Vincent Schiefer and "Quarks and Kytons" blog, 2014. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material, to include any derivation of, but not limited to, prototyping of proposed technologies and/or implementation of any or all parts of proposed commercial plans without express and written permission from this blog’s author and owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Kyle Vincent Schiefer and "Quarks and Kytons" blog with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

New York, NY - Lower West Side, Rooftop - 13 September 2014 ACE/AD

The Strawberry and the Watermelon:

In the Kytonic theory of the universe, there are only ever various levels of attraction and repulsion forces at work as particles drive to pair up with their nearest like-charged partner in order to “elevate” in kytonic level. Also, that life can only be considered alive once it reaches the “Progenitor Stage” or better understood as the 4th Kytonic Stage, and onward through time.

Due to the understanding of the visible spectrum of light as it applies to the charge density of an outer layer as opposed to its core (being either an odd or even numbered layer), visible light is an indicator of core charge if factored backward from current kytonic level. If you compare the Watermelon and the Strawberry in regards to the shape, consistency, hollow or dense core, and even color and shape of the reproductive vehicles;

Watermelon are a negative fruit, Strawberries are a positive fruit.

This fact is vindicated by the shape that has developed in relativity to the attraction and repulsion forces emanating from the Earth (+ / - gravity). Whereas the negative-core watermelon becomes predominantly rounded out in the relatively positive-dominant surroundings, the positive-core strawberry takes on a more conical shape as it is constantly under repulsive stress (moving upward/outward from the Earth’s surface) in a predominantly positive environment.

In addition to the shape, the external and internal color consistencies are indicative of the core charges in a predominantly positive-charge environment. When you consider that all plants and animals are made up in the same layered complexity as our celestial bodies and our planet earth, one can identify parts of both the watermelon and strawberry as the crust, mantle and core respectively. In the watermelon, we have a relatively negative-charge balanced, green rind, or crust layer, that allows the internals of the fruit to be encased (like a soap bubble) and protected from the opposing charges of the environment. The next deeper layer is the mantle-esque layer of the actual red melon. This portion is red in contrast to the green rind layer, and functions as a delicately balanced positive-dominant charge layer that is only just positive enough to allow it to achieve mass and counter balance the external pressures on the rind from the internal direction.

As we move deeper into the core portion of the melon, we have the negative core that, by virtue of its natural non-visible nature, also causes what appears to be a solid fruit as the core itself produces no displacement mass. Even the seeds themselves serve to bolster this theory in that they are in fact, the positive concentrations of energy that have been in constant strife trying to make contact with the negative core of the fruit similar to salmon swimming upstream to reproduce. However, in this aspect, they will slowly attempt to move closer to the core in order to balance out over time, and if they fail to make the journey, their color, density and weight will provide them with a chance (albeit a very low statistical probability) to try again in a subsequent crop. So they lie dormant until they are planted again, causing a singularity-like effect on the negative energies of both water, solar radiation, and even the soil in order to create a whole new watermelon (seemingly from nothing but a seed) that bears the ability to attract more positive concentrations and create more seeds during the crops lifetime.

The strawberry works in much the same way, only in a distinctly opposite fashion. Everyone knows that a healthy strawberry is a juicy, red color, it grows from the blossom of a plant, and is shaped relatively conically. If you understand that it is an intrinsically positive fruit, you can identify all the factors that cause it to appear the way we all have come to know. The shape of the strawberry comes into being as opposing forces war with each other in varying amounts. The positive core is pushed away from the earth, while the rest of the fruit has adapted and developed specifically to combat those forces, provide it with mass, and allow gravity to hold it in place. This creates the conical shaped derived from the constant shearing effect of repulsion in an upward/outward direction, that ultimately rounds out at the top once the majority of pushing force has been diverted (almost aerodynamically) and creates less interference, resulting in a more calm, spherical crown. Next, the outermost layer of the strawberry is shiny red with tiny yellow-green “seeds.” The shine on the exposed “flesh” naturally protects against direct absorption of solar radiation.

The seeds however, are filled with the negative reproductive energy that has been contained as minimally as possible within a positive shell similar to the watermelon’s rind. These seeds are tiny and as such, will not lose much reproductive information energy by transforming negative energy in positive in order to create a reproductive vessel, while simultaneously being small enough so as to avoid being crushed by larger objects. Comparative observation between the seeds of a watermelon and a strawberry, the visual differences could not be more perfect opposites. Next, as the “mantle” of the strawberry grows, the internal portion of the fruit seems to become hollow. This is due to the simple fact that the core expands outward as the fruit grows, and as the internal positive pressure becomes an overpressure compared to the fruits surroundings. This causes an expansion of mass bearing energy, however this positive core is more akin to the atmosphere we breathe every day and will not be visible to the naked eye in such a small concentration.

And there you have it, observational evidence of Kytonic theory in action.

Thanks for reading. Until next thought, dismiss nothing, and stay rational!

Concerning the impact relationships of fundamental particles relative to their intrinsic and surrounding charges as observed in atmospheric disturbances.

© Kyle Vincent Schiefer and "Quark and Kytons" blog, 2014. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material, to include derivation of, but not limited to, proposed technologies and/or commercial plans without express and written permission from this blog’s author and owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Kyle Vincent Schiefer and "Quarks and Kytons" with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

New York, NY - Lower West Side, Rooftop - 21 September 2014 ACE/AD

It is around 2pm/1400hrs, and there is a sizable fog in the air, or rather, an overcast day with a stratus layer that has descended low enough to engulf the uppermost portions of tall buildings nearby. What's peculiar and though provoking about this particular fog is that it is actually very warm outside despite the constant breeze and dim sunlight conditions. Based on my own observations, fog is typically accompanied by a very chill wind and lower temperatures. This being attributed to my experience seeing and feeling fog primarily during the colder Spring months on the west coast. And thus, I begin to ponder how this can be explained by fundamental Kytonic Theory.

It is through this line of thought that I realize that there must be some sort of relative interaction responsible for the disparity between my past experiences and my current one; and it is along this line of thought that I begin to more clearly understand the interactions between fundamental particles relative to their core charges and the charges of everything else around them. In the following, I will share the line of thought traveled in order to reach this conclusion with you in hopes that it may be used, with due credit, for the betterment of universal understanding and ultimate scientific advancement of the human race and all related Earthborne life.

This all begins with my first question and answer; what are clouds? What are they made of? Why and how do they form? What makes them do what they do, and interact the way they interact? So many questions all boil down to a few simple answers; water, and more specifically, water in the atmosphere, and the sun with it's forceful gamma radiation forcing the Earth's magnetic field to ripple like a waterbed or a gelatin mold. But that seems to be a bit of a big leap so I will take each question in stride.

What are clouds? At their core, they are condensed pockets of concentrated water vapor that embody a lower air pressure than their surroundings. Seems straightforward enough and most meteorologists would agree that this is the general understanding of clouds. After all, we see the weather depicted as high and low pressure systems all the time. But what if we were to understand the visual appearance of a cloud simply a pocket of overcharged water and air molecules that carry a significantly higher and warmer net energy charge than its surroundings. If that were the case, the pocket would take a longer time to fully dissipate outward when enveloped by both a higher pressure air and compressed by the downward force of gravity, as understood by plasmic dilution and thermodynamic dissipation of heat between two similar objects (hot and cold water would be the prime example).

As the water is forced to compress by the introduction of the squeezing forces of more pressurized, and "cooler" relative air and downward pull of gravity, we begin to see the "condensation" of energy in the form of a visible vapor accumulation, or a cloud. This makes a sort of "thick skin" layer of more compressed water vapor that becomes less permeable and actually hinders the diffusion of heat energy from the previously exposed water vapor into the surrounding atmosphere.

At this point, it can be surmised that the internal portions of clouds will always be warmer than the surrounding air. The applications of which could have profound impacts on redesigning commercial aircraft to be able to use this natural accumulation of atmospheric energy for "more green" energy generation purposes. Of course, this would need to be a overhaul redesign in order to maintain and reduce loss of over all aerodynamic properties. But I digress.

With most of the initial questions answered, I move on to identify what makes clouds come in so many shapes and sizes and what makes them seem to act in the ways that they do? The short answer; the sun's radiation. But, as always, why? The answer lies in the identification of another primary player in this atmospheric interaction relationship; the counter-point force that produces an outward "shielding" effect past our planet's very own positive energy radius (which is just a fancy way of saying Earth's magnetic field). The magnetic field acts as a dampener for all of the incoming radiant energy that could potentially cause problems on earth. That includes that radiation from our very own home star, Sol

Typically, the sun produces and expels energy in the form of gamma radiation, which, as understood by Kytonic theory, is a negative-dominant energy source as identified by its wave-like appearance in the cold vaccuum of space. This, coupled with the knowledge that the Earth's gravitational and magnetic fields as positive and negative dominant respectively, the attractive and repulsive effects of these interacting forces seems to carry it's own momentum. The procedure of which is as follows:

Negative-dominant, positive-core, gamma radiation waves impact the Earth's atmosphere

The magnetic/gravitational fields both reflects and absorbs the majority of gamma radiation

The ionosphere absorbs positive energy while reflecting excess negative back into space creating radiation energy in the form of light

The stratosphere absorbs negative energy while reflecting excess positive back up into the ionosphere creating radiation energy in the form of heat

The energy that does not get filtered out by the ionosphere and stratosphere travels down to the crust where it is observed in varying degrees of heat and light

These energy waves will enhance both downward force on, and energy charge of various gases in the lower atmosphere as they attempt to travel to the Earth's core

As varying amounts of energy reach the surface, they begin to further impact with positive charged matter (people, buildings, vegetation, soil, etc.) and create more and more heat

The energy is then absorbed or reflected similar to travel through the atmosphere and produces an upward draft accordingly

As the upward forces of radiant surface heat and our atmosphere collide with downward forces of extraplanetary radiation and heavy atmospheric particles that have absorbed the radiation, we get layers of atmospheric materials sandwiched between them, be it water vapor, dust or any other material that is hanging around in our sky

And thus. . . clouds!

If you were to position barometric scanning satellites into both low and high orbit, tasked to scan as much of the Earth's atmosphere possible, coupled with barometric ground radar systems, you could effectively use the data from these sources to compile a three-dimensional model of the earth's atmosphere.

Once you have that model, you can identify exactly where the majority of the sun's repelled radiation is infiltrating the atmosphere, as well as observe its constant direct effects on the the atmosphere itself.

You could then target specific sites for introduction of other elements (similar to current use of silver nitrate to induce rain) to mitigate storms by identifying radiation ripples that will propagate into larger storms

This would also allow a simplistic view of what we as a species are doing, specifically (i.e. carbon emissions, commercial air traffic, and populating otherwise flora-neccesary regions of the planet) that is contributing to an increasingly erratic, and less stable atmosphere and allow for enactment of social change down to the lowest levels

At this point I would attempt to mention a brief recap of Kytonic Theory's most underlying principle; all energy in existence consists of both positive and negative charges that strive to attain perfect balance and as such appear in partnered groupings in varying degrees of balance. Even if you appear to have perfect attractive balance between two objects, i.e. a rare-earth magnet and a ferromagnetic material, that doesn't always indicate charge balance. In fact, the two materials could be far from balance and simply attractive towards one another because of relative conditions and core-charges. But again, I digress.

With this more detailed understanding of the formation of clouds and general weather-creating effects, it can also be understood how the relationships of relative temperature at ground level as imparted by the previous day's sun absorption, and the current bombardment of gamma radiation interact to produce a warm layer of stratus clouds.

In New York, where people, buildings, and positive matter abound, you get a preponderance of higher radiant surface energy after periods of unhindered, direct sunlight and as such, will generally see more cloud cover during the spring and autumn seasons. This energy remains relatively low to the ground as it is collects in pockets not readily dissipated by the effects of positive-radiation particle-displacement, or more simply known as wind. With that in mind, it makes perfect sense why the weather today was a balmy, humid temperature even though there is a heavy fog/ cloud cover in the lower atmosphere.

This also means that you could, theoretically, observe the appearance of clouds st any level in the atmosphere. Although, realistically they will predominantly appear in areas of rapid environmental energy shifts of increasing radiant surface energy relative to lower pressure/higher charge atmospheric energy pockets.

With a full application of this understanding as related to mitigating and even fixing the effects of global warming with the technology we already posess, the ultimate idea I came to was as follows:

If we can control the weather, we can make the entire world a better place. Even if we needed to cause a storm in order to create the necessary cloud cover required to mitigate the effects of global warming, we could do it. And in doing so, take the proper precautions beforehand so as to mitigate the disastrous effects. The possibilities are widespread and well within our grasp. But yet again I digress. For that I apologize, the possibility of each kernel of knowledge serves to derail me time and time again.

Ultimately, if we apply what I have discussed so far, we can begin to reorganize the fundamental forces as we know them to be today. For instance, we understand gravity, electro-magnetism, and the nuclear forces to be the four fundamental forces. But we can see that in an interaction of only positive and negative magnetic-like forces, under varying layers of relative-charge conditions, will produce a multitude of effects. Magnetism can be considered a solid object against external negative charge impacts if it is within a surrounding frame of lower pressure, i.e the vacuum of space. Gravity serves to pull things down at ground-level, yet weakens exponentially as it moves further and further away from it's core singularity, yet is strong enough to accumulate vast amounts of positive energy in the form of an atmosphere to function as a plasmic solid against positive energy impacts. At the same time, the strong and weak nuclear forces of fusion that we observe on the surface of the sun, can be observed in our very atmosphere as a result of the very same relative charge impact reaction between us and the sun itself. I would dare say that each of these fundamental forces can only be considered thus due to the scope in which we view charge interactions of positive and negative energy charges colliding within positive or negative dominant surroundings.

This in turn can translate into a panoply of explanations for accumulation of simple and complex systems and materials as the product of varying impact and energy transfer quotients as observed through the passage of time. And as such, we can surmise that all matter, whether visible or not, carries with it energy that can be shared alike, siphoned away, or even increased dramatically dependent on the force of each impact relative to the internal and external charge relationships.

There are only two major energies that create the wind, heat, light, and humidity effects of our weather system, but due to the complexity and composition of our atmosphere we can have everything from a bright, clear, warm sunny days with beautiful sunsets, to gale-force winds, barrages of precipitation, and unbearable cold temperatures that threaten our very way of life. The only question remains, how can we use this knowledege for the betterment of humanity as a whole?

If you have made it this far, I applaud you because I know I can be long-winded. That said, if you like what you have read check back here often to read more. I will be writing about and uploading these ideas as fast as I have them. Thanks for reading, and I hope to see you back here soon.

Kytonic understanding of dual-polaric existence applied as reasonable cause for religious manifestation in the human psyche

New York, NY - College Campus, History Class - 22 September 2014 ACE/AD

In the scope of Kytonic understanding as positive energy being responsible for all mass bearing matter, and negative being responsible for all thought bearing matter, they will both be described as body and mind energy quotients for the duration of this thought.

If Kytonic theory in this scope holds true, it can be understood that all celestial bodies in existence, whether in space or an atmosphere bear at least 1 unit of both mind and body energy quotients to be considered a second Kytonic, "existence pair." That said, it could be hypothesized that while the Earth and sun can both be understood as bearing large quantities of mass and therefore body quotient, that they too would also bear a relative amount of mind quotient as well in order to provide the counter-force required to produce stability within these massive spherical bodies.

Now I follow this thought in the scope of the early development of human civilization being rife with religion as understood as the belief that there is a larger being that is conscious of, and dominant over all that we know. If we surmise that the earth has a consciousness somewhat comparable to its mass, what is to say that these very thoughts are not in fact cultivated from our own primitive perceptions of these mind energies emanating from the Earth itself?

While I am not a religious man myself, I cannot dismiss the logical possibility of a planetary, solar, or even celestial consciousness derived from this very mind quotient of negative energy in the universe.

As applied to life on Earth other than just humans; this would attempt to explain why more primitive forms of life, i.e. birds, dogs, and even fish, seem to be able to sense impending natural disasters like earthquakes and hurricanes even before we humans can. I hypothesize that this is primarily due to these creature's innate sensory perception, that, although complex enough to be aware, is not so complex that it carries higher frequency thought impulses (like how we are to pay our bills, plan our weekend, or even decide on what to have for lunch) that drown out these very low frequency, terrestrial thought waves. While it is true that these animals likely have more broad sensory ranges than humans and most zoologist may dismiss this behavior as them simply be sensing changes within the atmosphere, I must counter by asking, is that really so different from why I am suggesting?

If the Earth produces mind quotient radiation, then it is feasible to hypothesize that the sun produces a similar, and arguably more powerful, radiation that constantly bombards the surface of the Earth and the beings upon it with it's own thought emanations during the daylight hours. Alternately, it can be assumed that during non-direct hours of the day, the ripples from this sunlight impact would begin to dissipate into the surrounding atmosphere and eventually become relatively still and calm, and thus allowing for a more "quiet" environment with which to focus on these energies directly.

We already have some observed occurrences of this in the ancient superstitious beliefs of the "witching hour." This time, for those who do not know, is understood as the mid-night time in which individuals claimed to be more in tune with higher natural energies in their surroundings. This sounds very much like what I am describing. Although lacking veracity, and seated primarily in the realm of superstition, there are multiple reports from many cultures around the world that seem to describe similar events within these superstitious beliefs (druids, pagans, witches, etc.). If this time is understood as a time of very low degrees of extra planetary energy interference, it makes sense that this would be accompanied by times of increased awareness of natural thought energies being produced by our home planet.

All superstition aside, and within the realms of rational thought, I wonder; what is to say that the awareness of these energies, coupled with the already stressed or otherwise unfocused thoughts of early humans was not misconstrued as a higher heavenly being that we have historically developed and eventually come to call "God?" Even the belief in multiple gods of the river, sky, sun, fertility etc., could all plausibly have derived from this early synaptic awareness of external thought frequencies. As a matter of fact, all through history we have all walks of human beings that claim to have been "spoken to" by their god(s), otherworldly spirits, or even the Earth itself in the case of the hippy counterculture still present today. Something happening once is an event. Twice is a coincidence. But three or more occurrences enters the realm of becoming a pattern, and that makes me question "why?"

Between the ancient Egyptian deities, the Greek-turned-Roman gods, even the modern held beliefs in the mainstream figures of Jesus Christ, "God," and even Allah, it is clear to see that there is something more than simple coincidence occurring. But as a rational, agnostic individual, I prefer to question and seek logical conclusions, outlined herein, rather than simply following blind faith as many religious congregations would ask me to do. As I reach these conclusions, and subsequently more questions than I started with, based on naught but a more fundamental theory of the universe, I can't help but feel hesitant in sharing such outlandish and radical thoughts. However, I will continue to share such thoughts in hopes that they may trigger deeper and more clear understandings in the "mind quotients" of my peers.

If you have made it this far, then I thank you for reading and I hope to see you back soon. Until my next thought, dismiss nothing, and stay rational!