Sunday, June 7, 2015

Concerning the artificial manipulation of atoms via the wave modulation of motional states

 ©Kyle Vincent Schiefer and "Quark and Kytons" blog, 2014. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material, to include derivation of, but not limited to, proposed technologies and/or commercial plans without express and written permission from this blog’s author and owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Kyle Vincent Schiefer and "Quarks and Kytons" with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Within the constraints of the Kytonic Theory of the universe, all energy in the universe is, by its nature, imbalanced, and dominated by either a positive or negative motional charge. The resulting drive-state of imbalanced energy clusters act like magnets as the kytonic bodies are attracted and repelled by relative bodies as they seek to combine and mix with similarly opposed charges in an attempt to regain true terminal neutrality.


As kytonic bodies repeatedly impact with opposing charges, groups can become charge-heavy with excess energy that can ultimately cause a motional "wobble" that can to do more harm than good to the energy cluster; especially in an opposing-charge atmosphere. This happens specifically when the drive charge of the body in question becomes twice as strong as the passenger, resulting in a >2/3 imbalance. This can also happen if the drive charge becomes outweighed by the passenger should it become <1/2 of the total charge amount in a relative atmosphere. When this happens, an increased imbalance occurs that immediately begins to correct itself accordingly by driving to, or pulling in, the energy it now needs to correct itself. Simultaneously, the cluster will begin radiating the excess charge that has become heavy with in order to further strive for balance.

As these radiation energies are released, they will exhibit relative effects and  one of three wave forms that correspond to its dominant charge as interacting with an opposing atmosphere. motional state of its dominant charge, but will react differently in subsequent impacts due to the heavy one-sided charge relationship. These radiation energies will exhibit a natural state of decay as it drives to rectify it's imbalance by being absorbed by, or otherwise combined with other kytonic bodies in it's surroundings under the conditions of relative atmospherics. Depending on the dominant charge of these energies, the three radiation states are as follows:
  • Positive-dominant (Heat Waves/Infrared Radiation)
  • Negative-dominant (Light Waves/Gamma Radiation)
  • Neutral-Dominant (Magnetic Waves/X-Radiation)
Depending on the rate of decay of these energies, they will typically all appear in non-visible, wave form, due to their weak charges in relative-opposing atmospheres. (However, it is all relative based on core charges in relation to their surroundings.) And because the relativity of kytonic energy is constant, it is possible to have radiant energies impacting one another (macro or micro, they are still work the same) to create tertiary effects that have the ability to both rectify or exacerbate their own imbalances.

For example, imagine that in the vast void of space (negative dominant atmosphere), there existed a near-balanced star that held a net charge of -1 : +2. Now imagine that a radiation impact resulted in the net charge change that caused the star's core to become +5 : -2. the resulting spin charge would create a semi-stationary gravitational singularity that would both gravitationally attract (since it can't readily move) as much negative energy as possible, while simultaneously radiating as much excess positive energy as possible in order to regain a manageable balance. This type of event would result in a black hole that would appear to spit out more energy than it pulled in.

So how is this relevant? 

Understanding the fundamental relationship of kytonic impacts yield two crucial pieces of information; motional states occur when clusters of positive and negative energy impact with each other in relative atmospheres, and that 

If we could replicate this consumption/radiation effect by altering the relative motional states of objects (spin = relative positive/ vector = relative negative)

****This blog entry is incomplete and has been a "draft" for months, but still bears publishing****

theFirstAssignment - PermaCAM - 4-D metalCasting is the way of the future *cough*

Directions: Read each section in its entirety before moving onto the next section. Only read them the right way, and complete steps in order. For fun, figure out, and then read them in number order. To learn, view them in number order (they don’t go higher than ten). 3 times. They are arranged relatively based on freeform chronological organization, and represent the real order of original thought, and is completely at the reader’s discretion.


This assignment is designed to reflect how-to refine the ability capture the momentary insights/thoughts in a disorganized, yet coherent and transcribe-able form, in order to further-strengthen the ability to understand, listen, and grow through the age old value of sharing. Author’ Note: this assignment is for entertainment purposes only, and in order to avoid any form of academic plagiarism, nothing in here has ever been published before, and the contents herein were both initiated and concluded between 04-07 June, and copyrighted 1700 and 2130hrs EST, 07 June, 2015 .C.E

(1)  Environmental factors listed below are for author’s personal mnemonic reference
/|-PermaCAM technologies – Technological Musing and Experiment Proposal Narrative
  |
Listening to: ‘boys like girls’ self-titled album playlist on youtube.com
Viewing: random Wikipedia page on band, “A Perfect Circle”

(2.
Links an’ death screens are blue,
Misspelling Errors are red,
but the [green strikethrough,>>>8:>-~.~.~. ^>_,’*` .7]
is the only one I "dread"
6. Five can’t jive to stay alive
Waves oscillate,
And Particles “dance,”
Magnets are;
My “Floedipans”

(9) If you want to learn something, read the dictionary. If you never have done so, there is a sample entry below to get you started.
7. Floedipans n. -of or pertaining to a society of individuals whom understand the physiological-science behind self-sustained energy through magn-ification of defined spatial relativity and related physical sciences, – (visually refers to a garment or accompaniment/accoutrement that must be included in a composite resource to increase net buoyancy (see. Apples and Celery). Pronounced through controlled use of three syllables that peak in the middle; sounds like “flow-DEE-pans” with pans sounding similar to “pants,” and “flow” carrying phonetic similarity to the sound made when pronouncing the ‘oe’ in “Oedipus.” can refer to individuals who exhibit heightened sensory cap-ability, or mood that seems to remain unaffected by their environment, and possibly affectationally-postive on their surroundings over TIME/

3.) Academic mumbo jumbo for nerds starts here and it'll pretty much seem like gibberish to anyone who isn't me, but you can give it a try.. Its really just the same thing said in multiple ways in order to evoke key psychological stimuli, and foster greater understanding of future lesson regarding typical life. (you may skip it if you'd like)
PermaCAM - Synthesis program, skill, and working knowledge of 4-D metal casting (chrono-magneto roto-casting procedure) to imbue the cast parts with specific heat, vibration, sound or any other form of electrically conductive properties for use in more complex energy transformation devices.
-if we know that quantum superposition between waves and particles /or the difference between zeros and ones on a digital device/ is pretty much a sure thing, then that would imply that for every wave or particle that pops into existence, there is an equal or "opposite" form of anti-energy that very likely exists alongside the observable, or otherwise "real" and measurable quotient of energy.
This creates a very stark If/Then duality of our entire universe when considered through the duplicitous lens of quantum superposition. And while we do not yet have the tools powerful or efficient enough to glean the testable precision necessary to prove this hypothesis in short order (the best one we have isn't smaller than 27km in circumference, and doesn't really allow for the widespread commercial availability, and mad-science-innovation-mentality-boom that would give it the attention it needs for breakthroughs in human advancement), we could still apply the same principles to the next practical version of technological advancement. For example:
               If we could indeed harness both of the superimposed energies at the same time, it would theoretically be possible to gain an efficiency output of greater than 100%, if it were indeed possible to apply a physical-mechanical, and deeply scientific knowledge to the construction of machines that are capable of efficient creation of usable energy output. Automobiles are the closest we have come to engineering such machines (through the combination of vacuum, compression and various systems to burn fuel), but when we do the math, the weight of the vehicle constantly having to overcome gravity per sec./per sec., creates an continuous loss of efficiency while the "machine" is actively in use. Being able to gain greater than 100% efficiency from a machine has virtually limitless possibilities, and can solve many issues that currently face humanity, like renewable power generation, resource recycling technologies, and even enhanced communications technologies.
But how to we harness this second energy and gain such potential out of our machines?
First we must consider the superposition of particle and wave is no more than a natural duality of nature, creating two forms of energy. There are many forms of energy dualities in this world, light/heat, electricity/magnetism, and the like, but for the purposes of inspiring a greater scientific understanding of this hypothesis, we will consider the similarity of traditional potential, and kinetic energies "duality." Except, in the case of harnessing the states of superposition, we must multiply the maximum, real "potential energy" by a value of two, in order to account for the equal and opposite net value of both; a kinetic, measurable particle, and potential particle that has a super-opposed value from its current "wave" state. Through this thinking, the force of kinetic energy creates a vacuum of potential energy that could theoretically be harnessed simply by devising a system that covers all of these new variables, at every step of processing input energy. At this point in time, the highest level of /per sec. output efficiency that I can conceive of is a 1.49^­3% due to the necessary level of input required to "run" any such machine, and the resulting loss of efficiency at a rate of no less than -1/3 of the given output at any moment in time, per sec./per sec, and no matter how infinitesimally small we may be able to compress, shear, or inversely "absorb" said inefficiencies through machine design, the loss will never cease to "exist" as a real variable that must be accounted for, until the input energy similarly ceases.
If we continue this thinking, it is theoretically possible to account for all necessary variables of efficiency or concomitant energy loss through the duration of machine-processing of energy simply by accounting for the maximum potential energy of any operation of "work." However, to find the potential maximum, we must understand which superposed state of energy yields the greater quotient of harness-able, or "intended" type of energy output, as relative to the initial input. As long as we do this for every stage of energy processing/transformation, we can consistently account for each "qubit" of energy and (depending on the regulatory capacity of said machines) "tweak" the parameters of energy processing by simply creating a real degree of vacuum in every stage of production that would inadvertently create a void-space "path of least resistance" that would function as the "circuitry" necessary to even utilize this energy. To be clear, the laws of thermodynamics, electromagnetics, and even fluid/gaseous buoyancy and pressure rules all still apply, meaning that we must allow for the exponential flow of vacuum into our machine to account for the balancing of variables that derive more output than input, almost like a continual need to breathe. However, in a contained system, we can ensure that we "feed" only specific gases or liquids into the vacuum, to not only create a stable atmosphere for energy conversion, but to define specific output energy states based on relative-reactionary combination of elemental materials during "combustion," "compression," or other such stage of energy conversion.
At this time, I would like to bring your attention to the fact that it would seem that our theoretical "stream" of energy is already becoming quite complex. However, atmosphere, and input/output are only two parts of the equation, and there are always more variable to account for; for each new one introduced, there are two more that must be properly accounted for, one in the real, kinetic sense, and one in the imagined, potential sense. And since extraction of any type of work as kinetic energy requires closed-system circuitry in order to create a forward flow of energy, the only way to create a stable flow, or oscillation of superposed energies is to create a circuit that allows potential energy to flow naturally into the desired kinetic superposed state (that will efficiently yield the greater output), and will eliminate "wasted-potential" energy for every quantum moment of work extraction. This can be done by simply positioning input/output vectors along axes that correspond to relative desired-energy-state, as determined through the various laws of thermodynamics and eM, and the like, as I mentioned earlier.
While I do not want to make this too complex from the start, I find that the simple clue that magnetism is capable of overcoming the pull of gravity is a prominent clue to building such machines, by being able to easily surpass the struggle of accounting for the effects of gravity simply by utilizing specific eM properties of different metals, or of outside power sources, for various experimental designs and testing, we are one step closer to accounting for and controlling at least 3 spatial dimension forces as we attempt to control the input/output variables of energy transformation and utilization. What is more, through this combination of quantum supposition, natural supersymmetry, and traditional physical laws, we can begin to delve into the unknown by experimentally combining these different forces, laws, and underlying theories at a deeper level than we ever have by turning the tables on the way we think. We will reverse engineer the tools that we need to adequately prove or disprove modern theories, by supposing the natural unification of, and between, what we DO know, while finding searching for the common denominators rather than trying to develop new functions that allow the numerators to reduce to zero. In this way we assume that the highly coveted "zero" is in fact a vacuum of negatively-symmetrical superposed-state-energy, and represents both the naturally balancing zero-izing-effect of equalized potential and kinetic energies, while simultaneously representing and equal and opposite superposed potential and kinetic energies through quantum mechanics. In other words, the equalize a quantum equation, you must do so as if any ONE variable measured represents no less than four outcomes. P+/P- and K+/K-. Positive and negative potential and kinetic energy being the corresponding superposed state that matches the real one.

[Signed,}-

With love,

The Professor